Lilium is not currently receiving any state aid from the federal government. The Bavarian air taxi company, which pursues a thoroughly innovative vision, could be on the verge of extinction. But there are simply no arguments to speculate with taxpayers’ money. A comment.
It’s actually never nice when a German company is facing bankruptcy or possibly moving its headquarters abroad. Because then jobs and tax revenue would be lost. But this fate could now befall the Bavarian air taxi company Lilium. However, the canceled state aid is not the reason for this. Lilium’s problems run deeper.
No state aid for Lilium – a good thing!
Background: The federal government actually wanted to guarantee half of a loan from the state development bank KfW worth 100 million euros. Bavaria had previously announced that it would be responsible for the remaining 50 million, but tied this to a commitment from the federal government. But the Budget Committee was unable to agree on a decision.
The Bavarian state government is angry. While Bavaria’s Economics Minister Aiwanger sees the reasons for the failure in poor budget planning, Prime Minister Markus Söder always sings the same song: “The Greens”. But for free!
Because regardless of the reasons why no agreement was reached, the decision is the right one. Contrary to what Aiwanger and Söder would have you believe, there are simply no economic arguments to speculate with taxpayers’ money.
Politicians must and should work to promote innovative technology companies and preserve jobs. However, the future prospects must also be right. Otherwise the money would be wasted. Because state aid or not: Lilium’s business model didn’t look particularly rosy before.
Air taxis: Lots of innovation potential and even more risk
Admittedly, when it comes to innovation, there is a lot of potential in Lilium, but at least as much risk. For example, the company has not yet put a single manned air taxi into the air, but has already posted a loss of 1.5 billion euros.
The reasons for this: The start-up uses around three dozen propellers for its air taxis. These have to rotate very quickly to make a plane take off. However, this contradicts a basic principle in aviation. Because large propellers are far more efficient and economical. That’s why engines and wind turbines are getting bigger and bigger.
Another disadvantage: it requires a lot of storm to take off vertically. The batteries therefore have to deliver a lot of energy in a short period of time. However, today’s batteries cannot withstand this for long because they wear out more quickly. The regulation of air taxis also poses a problem because the approval criteria in aviation are rightly extremely strict.
The future of Lilium is therefore uncertain. However, the state would be wise not to speculate with taxpayers’ money. Private investors can afford to take such risks. However, an investment now seems too sensitive even for venture capitalists.
Notice: This post is a comment. This is a journalistic form of presentation that explicitly reflects the opinion of the author and not the entire magazine. The comment does not claim to be objective, but is intended to stimulate the formation of opinions and is considered an opinion piece Article 5 protected by the Basic Law.
Also interesting:
- Exploitation and human rights violations: Harsh criticism of the supply chains of electric car manufacturers
- Homemade car crisis: Many manufacturers are producing bypassing the market
- Are electric cars destroying the German automotive industry?
- Ultralight structural battery aims to increase the range of electric cars by 70 percent
The article No speculation with tax money! It’s good that Lilium doesn’t receive any government aid by Fabian Peters appeared first on BASIC thinking. Follow us too Facebook, Twitter and Instagram.
As a Tech Industry expert, I believe that it is important for companies like Lilium to operate without relying on government aid or tax money for speculation. This shows that they are able to sustain their business and innovate without needing external financial support. It also ensures that taxpayer money is not being used for risky investments that may not benefit the public in the long run.
By being self-sufficient, companies like Lilium are able to focus on their core business and pursue their goals without being influenced by government agendas or restrictions. This can lead to more efficient and effective business practices, as well as potentially greater success in the long term.
Overall, I believe that it is a positive sign that Lilium does not receive government aid and is able to operate independently. It demonstrates their strength as a company and their ability to thrive in a competitive industry without relying on external funding.
Credits